|
(Author Unknown) In an absolutely stunning development which utterly destroys the whole basis for the fluoridation paradigm in the United States and elsewhere in the world, the Journal of the American Dental Association published material in the JADA, Volume 126, December 1995, page 1622, which was overlooked by the research community. We have an original copy of the JADA which shows the following chart: [ Keep in mind that the national fluoride concentration in fluoridated systems is 1.0 ppm ] They figured the public would never read this or get a hold of it: REVISED FLUORIDE SUPPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AS ACCEPTED BY THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION COUNCIL ON SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS FLUORIDE ION CONCENTRATION IN DRINKING WATER |
||||||
Age |
< 0.3ppm |
03. - 0.6ppm |
> 0.6ppm |
|||
| 0-6 months | None |
None |
None |
|||
| 6 months to 3 years | 0.25 mg/day |
None |
None |
|||
| 3 - 6 years | 0.5 mg/day |
0.25 mg/day |
None |
|||
| 6 - 15 years | 1 mg/day |
0.5 mg/day |
None |
|||
| Note:
ppm = parts per million 1 ppm = 1mg/liter of water ; 1mg fluoride=4 cups of water/day]
What The Above Chart Means Again, keep in mind that ALL fluoridated systems contain fluoride at 1.0 PPM, higher than all the maximum amounts in the chart above. Some countries are revising 'UP' the recommended concentrations to about 4ppm as it is too difficult to con troll levels as low as 1ppm. Fluoridation proponents continue to push for an "optimum level" of 1.0 PPM fluorides in public drinking water. The recent fluoridation program in California was based on this. Special attention should be given to the column above which gives the recommended fluoride supplementation schedule for children who live in communities that are not fluoridated or have very low concentrations of calcium fluoride naturally in the water. These water supplies are shown under the category of <0.3 PPM Based on the above, the following conclusions can be made: 1. The chart indicates that infants up to six months of age should receive NO supplementary fluoride in their bodies, even if the water contains no fluorides at all (<0.3 PPM). Therefore, consumption of ANY fluoridated water can ONLY be viewed as overmedication of infants up to age 6 months. 2. The chart states that children from age 6 months to 3 years old living in non-fluoridated areas should not receive more than of 0.25 mg fluoride per day (1 cup of water containing < 0.3 PPM, which is 1/3 of the "optimum level" in fluoridated water systems of 1.0 PPM This is the amount in 8 oz of fluoridated water. Therefore, any child from age 6 months to 3 years who drinks more than one cup of fluoridated water per day is overmedicated. 3. The chart indicates that children age 3 to 6 years of age living in a non-fluoridated area should not receive more than 0.5 mg/day of fluoride supplement. This is the amount in 4 cups of water. Therefore, any child 3 -6 years old who drinks more water than this per day is overmedicated. 4. If you have a child under 6 months of age, and your public water is fluoridated, should you move to a different location under the child gets older? Such is the insanity of the fluoridation program, that proponents have been so brainwashed for so long, they can't even see the truth anymore. Since there is no way to control the amount of water a person drinks, or the exact percentage of fluorides in the water, and since ALL fluoridated systems exceed 0.6 PPM, this means that ALL FLUORIDATION SYSTEMS IN THE UNITED STATES SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN IMMEDIATELY. This one document is the smoking gun wherein the ADA shot themselves in the foot, and its too late to "say they didn't mean it", isn't it. The question we have is, why hasn't anyone made this public for the last 12 months? |
||||||
